In this video, I break down the arguments and claims made by Zakir Naik, especially his famous speeches about “scientific miracles” in the Qur’an. I go step by step through the verses he points to — like mountains having roots, the universe expanding, or embryology descriptions — and show how these claims often rely on stretched interpretations, vague language, or selective readings that don’t hold up when you compare them to real science or historical context.

I also highlight how Naik’s style — mixing rapid-fire facts, audience applause, and confident delivery — can make weak arguments sound convincing if you’re not paying close attention. The video invites viewers to slow down, look at the details, and ask: are these really miracles, or are we just seeing the power of clever presentation? So here’s the big question: when charisma and selective facts collide, are we still willing to examine what’s true underneath?